linux-kernel - Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh0M10owjNcKvw3Vgdv7_SwJch4d0HEjBXYj3nPfrJ-UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:45:52 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for v5.18

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 1:28 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/for-mergewindow

Oh, and another comment about this pull request: you are one of five
people whose pull requests remain unsigned.

So you're not exactly alone, but it's a (happily) shrinking group of
kernel maingainers that don't use signed tags for pulls.

Of course, I haven't checked the ones that are still pending in
linux-next, but I've done 127 merges so far this merge window, and 93%
of them have been using signed tags (and three of them have been the
Andrew Morton email patch-bomb merges).

Yes, that's a good percentage, but it could be even better. Hint hint.

               Linus