[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aaed94ae-047d-b16c-3d9b-7e431a212b82@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 21:26:20 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: haibo.chen@....com, aford@...conembedded.com,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: mmc: imx-esdhc: Update compatible
fallbacks
On 27/03/2022 14:38, Adam Ford wrote:
> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
> as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
> HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP,
> it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because
> those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm.
>
> Suggested-by: haibo.chen@....com
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> ---
> V2: Added suggested-by note and imx8qxp updates.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
YAML and logic looks good, although I did not check the actual hardware
properties.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists