linux-kernel - [PATCH] opp: fix a missing check on list iterator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220327053943.3071-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Mar 2022 13:39:43 +0800
From:   Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>
To:     vireshk@...nel.org
Cc:     nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] opp: fix a missing check on list iterator

The bug is here:
    dev = new_dev->dev;

The list iterator 'new_dev' will point to a bogus position containing
HEAD if the list is empty or no element is found. This case must
be checked before any use of the iterator, otherwise it will lead
to a invalid memory access.

To fix this bug, add an check. Use a new variable 'iter' as the
list iterator, while use the old variable 'new_dev' as a dedicated
pointer to point to the found element.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: deaa51465105a ("PM / OPP: Add debugfs support")
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>
---
 drivers/opp/debugfs.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/opp/debugfs.c b/drivers/opp/debugfs.c
index 596c185b5dda..a4476985e4ce 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/debugfs.c
@@ -187,14 +187,19 @@ void opp_debug_register(struct opp_device *opp_dev, struct opp_table *opp_table)
 static void opp_migrate_dentry(struct opp_device *opp_dev,
 			       struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
-	struct opp_device *new_dev;
+	struct opp_device *new_dev = NULL, *iter;
 	const struct device *dev;
 	struct dentry *dentry;
 
 	/* Look for next opp-dev */
-	list_for_each_entry(new_dev, &opp_table->dev_list, node)
-		if (new_dev != opp_dev)
+	list_for_each_entry(iter, &opp_table->dev_list, node)
+		if (iter != opp_dev) {
+			new_dev = iter;
 			break;
+		}
+
+	if (!new_dev)
+		return;
 
 	/* new_dev is guaranteed to be valid here */
 	dev = new_dev->dev;
-- 
2.17.1