linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: kfence: fix objcgs vector allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWfudKnm71uNQtS-=+3_m25nsfPDo8-vZYzrktQbxHUMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 23:51:11 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: kfence: fix objcgs vector allocation

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:43 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 15:28, Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > If the kfence object is allocated to be used for objects vector, then
> > this slot of the pool eventually being occupied permanently since
> > the vector is never freed.  The solutions could be 1) freeing vector
> > when the kfence object is freed or 2) allocating all vectors statically.
> > Since the memory consumption of object vectors is low, it is better to
> > chose 2) to fix the issue and it is also can reduce overhead of vectors
> > allocating in the future.
> >
> > Fixes: d3fb45f370d9 ("mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLAB")
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>

Thanks.

>
> Btw, how did you test this?
>

Yeah. No problem.