linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] signal/x86: Delay calling signals in atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YkHjLkDsA4oYj9rU@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 18:32:46 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal/x86: Delay calling signals in atomic

On 2022-03-28 09:41:37 [-0500], Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I want to say the patch below looks like it was a perfectly fine debug
> patch to see if what someone thinks is the issue is the issue.  It is
> not a good final solution for the reasons I have already mentioned.
> 
> May I ask where the rest of the conversation was?  I can only find the
> single posting of this patch on linux-kernel without any conversation,
> and the description indicates this change has seen several rounds of
> development.

There was not feedback based on what has been posted to lkml.
This, was ended as this patch, was originally posted by Steven as
	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20120124191454.345715521@goodmis.org/

a few iterations later we got to v4 in
	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20120203183041.427463295@goodmis.org/

which got review from Oleg and then become Oleg's in v5
	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20120208005850.233662427@goodmis.org/

and was part of the RT queue since v3.0.20-rt36.

> Eric

Sebastian