| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220324014836.19149-2-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:48:12 +0300
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/25] dmaengine: dw-edma: Drop dma_slave_config.direction field usage
The dma_slave_config.direction field usage in the DW eDMA driver has been
introduced in the commit bd96f1b2f43a ("dmaengine: dw-edma: support local
dma device transfer semantics"). Mainly the change introduced there was
correct (indeed DEV_TO_MEM means using RD-channel and MEM_TO_DEV -
WR-channel for the case of having eDMA accessed locally from
CPU/Application side), but providing an additional
MEM_TO_MEM/DEV_TO_DEV-based semantics was quite redundant if not to say
potentially harmful (when it comes to removing the denoted field). First
of all since the dma_slave_config.direction field has been marked as
obsolete (see [1] and the structure dc [2]) and will be discarded in
future, using it especially in a non-standard way is discouraged. Secondly
in accordance with the commit denoted above the default
dw_edma_device_transfer() semantics has been changed despite what it's
message said. So claiming that the method was left backward compatible was
wrong.
Anyway let's fix the problems denoted above and simplify the
dw_edma_device_transfer() method by dropping the parsing of the
DMA-channel direction field. Instead of having that implicit
dma_slave_config.direction field semantic we can use the recently added
DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL flag to distinguish between the local and remote DW
eDMA setups thus preserving both cases support. In addition to that an
ASCII-figure has been added to clarify the complication out.
[1] Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst
[2] include/linux/dmaengine.h: dma_slave_config.direction
Co-developed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
---
In accordance with agreement with Frank and Manivannan this patch is
supposed to be moved to the series:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20220310192457.3090-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com/
in place of the patch:
[PATCH v5 6/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Don't rely on the deprecated "direction" member
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20220310192457.3090-7-Frank.Li@nxp.com/
---
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
index 5be8a5944714..e9e32ed74aa9 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
@@ -339,21 +339,40 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
if (!chan->configured)
return NULL;
- switch (chan->config.direction) {
- case DMA_DEV_TO_MEM: /* local DMA */
- if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
- break;
- return NULL;
- case DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: /* local DMA */
- if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
- break;
- return NULL;
- default: /* remote DMA */
- if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
- break;
- if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
- break;
- return NULL;
+ /*
+ * Local Root Port/End-point Remote End-point
+ * +-----------------------+ PCIe bus +----------------------+
+ * | | +-+ | |
+ * | DEV_TO_MEM Rx Ch <----+ +---+ Tx Ch DEV_TO_MEM |
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | MEM_TO_DEV Tx Ch +----+ +---> Rx Ch MEM_TO_DEV |
+ * | | +-+ | |
+ * +-----------------------+ +----------------------+
+ *
+ * 1. Normal logic:
+ * If eDMA is embedded into the DW PCIe RP/EP and controlled from the
+ * CPU/Application side, the Rx channel (EDMA_DIR_READ) will be used
+ * for the device read operations (DEV_TO_MEM) and the Tx channel
+ * (EDMA_DIR_WRITE) - for the write operations (MEM_TO_DEV).
+ *
+ * 2. Inverted logic:
+ * If eDMA is embedded into a Remote PCIe EP and is controlled by the
+ * MWr/MRd TLPs sent from the CPU's PCIe host controller, the Tx
+ * channel (EDMA_DIR_WRITE) will be used for the device read operations
+ * (DEV_TO_MEM) and the Rx channel (EDMA_DIR_READ) - for the write
+ * operations (MEM_TO_DEV).
+ *
+ * It is the client driver responsibility to choose a proper channel
+ * for the DMA transfers.
+ */
+ if (chan->dw->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL) {
+ if ((chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ && dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) ||
+ (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV))
+ return NULL;
+ } else {
+ if ((chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE && dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) ||
+ (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV))
+ return NULL;
}
if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_CYCLIC) {
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists