linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Better handle dependencies on Sphinx extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:00:47 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Better handle dependencies on Sphinx extensions

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> writes:

> Sphinx has its own way to identify the need of rebuilding the documentation.
> It means that extensions need to use an internal API in order to notify about
> the need to consider other files.
>
> The kerneldoc.py extension already does that, maintainers_include.py doesn't
> need (as it uses an API that internally does that), and kfigure.py does it on a
> different way.  So, those are already safe.
>
> However, other extensions don't notify nor implement their own checks,
> so, when a file that was parsed by them is changed, the corresponding 
> documentation won't be rebuilt.
>
> This series add support for it for ABI, features and kernel-include.

Series applied, thanks.

jon