[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1586f68e-c635-482f-9399-2b027b766543@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:55:11 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
harry.wentland@....com, sunpeng.li@....com,
Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com, alexander.deucher@....com,
Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@....com>,
Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@....com>,
Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: detach fpu operations from
dcn10_validate_bandwidth in calcs
Am 26.03.22 um 21:24 schrieb Melissa Wen:
> dcn10_validate_bandwidth is only used on dcn10 files, but is declared in
> dcn_calcs files. Rename dcn10_* to dcn_* in calcs, remove DC_FP_* wrapper
> inside DML folder and create an specific dcn10_validate_bandwidth in
> dcn10_resources that calls dcn_validate_bandwidth and properly wraps that
> FPU function with DC_FP_* macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c | 5 +----
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
> index 4048908dd265..1587a060b55a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
> @@ -1141,6 +1141,20 @@ static void dcn10_destroy_resource_pool(struct resource_pool **pool)
> *pool = NULL;
> }
>
> +static bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> + struct dc *dc,
> + struct dc_state *context,
> + bool fast_validate)
> +{
> + bool voltage_supported;
> +
> + DC_FP_START();
> + voltage_supported = dcn_validate_bandwidth(dc, context, fast_validate);
> + DC_FP_END();
> +
> + return voltage_supported;
> +}
> +
> static enum dc_status dcn10_validate_plane(const struct dc_plane_state *plane_state, struct dc_caps *caps)
> {
> if (plane_state->format >= SURFACE_PIXEL_FORMAT_VIDEO_BEGIN
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
> index e447c74be713..c25023f7d604 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static unsigned int get_highest_allowed_voltage_level(uint32_t chip_family,
> return 4;
> }
>
> -bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> +bool dcn_validate_bandwidth(
> struct dc *dc,
> struct dc_state *context,
> bool fast_validate)
> @@ -790,7 +790,6 @@ bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> dcn_bw_sync_calcs_and_dml(dc);
>
> memset(v, 0, sizeof(*v));
> - DC_FP_START();
>
> v->sr_exit_time = dc->dcn_soc->sr_exit_time;
> v->sr_enter_plus_exit_time = dc->dcn_soc->sr_enter_plus_exit_time;
> @@ -1323,8 +1322,6 @@ bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> bw_limit = dc->dcn_soc->percent_disp_bw_limit * v->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmax0p9;
> bw_limit_pass = (v->total_data_read_bandwidth / 1000.0) < bw_limit;
>
> - DC_FP_END();
> -
> PERFORMANCE_TRACE_END();
> BW_VAL_TRACE_FINISH();
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h
> index 337c0161e72d..806f3041db14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ struct dcn_ip_params {
> };
> extern const struct dcn_ip_params dcn10_ip_defaults;
>
> -bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> +bool dcn_validate_bandwidth(
> struct dc *dc,
> struct dc_state *context,
> bool fast_validate);
Just for the record: That's not really usual kernel coding style, but
that's not topic of this patch set.
The series is Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
And it would be really nice if we could make the DC_FP_* macros somehow
fail in the dml folder.
Thanks,
Christian.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists