[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkELRUfrwSYap4Mr@yury-laptop>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 18:11:33 -0700
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/bitmap.c make bitmap_print_bitmask_to_buf parseable
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:04:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 8:39 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The documentation of such function is not on a proper ReST format,
> > as reported by Sphinx:
> >
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:532: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:526: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:532: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:532: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:533: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:536: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:542: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:536: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:536: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:543: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:552: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:545: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:545: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:552: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:552: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:554: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:556: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:580: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> >
> > So, the produced output at:
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/kernel-api.html?#c.bitmap_print_bitmask_to_buf
> >
> > is broken. Fix it by adding spaces and marking the literal blocks.
>
> LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Thanks!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Applied to bitmap branch
https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/bitmap
Thanks,
Yury
> > ---
> > lib/bitmap.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
> > index 0d5c2ece0bcb..8ebe508580ea 100644
> > --- a/lib/bitmap.c
> > +++ b/lib/bitmap.c
> > @@ -527,33 +527,39 @@ static int bitmap_print_to_buf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > * cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() or directly by drivers to export hexadecimal
> > * bitmask and decimal list to userspace by sysfs ABI.
> > * Drivers might be using a normal attribute for this kind of ABIs. A
> > - * normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
> > - * static ssize_t example_attribute_show(struct device *dev,
> > + * normal attribute typically has show entry as below::
> > + *
> > + * static ssize_t example_attribute_show(struct device *dev,
> > * struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > - * {
> > + * {
> > * ...
> > * return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &mask, nr_trig_max);
> > - * }
> > + * }
> > + *
> > * show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
> > * means the file is limited to one page only.
> > * bitmap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
> > - * normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
> > - * bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > + * normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count::
> > + *
> > + * bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > * int nmaskbits)
> > - * {
> > - * }
> > + * {
> > + * }
> > + *
> > * The problem is once we have a large bitmap, we have a chance to get a
> > * bitmask or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be
> > * as complex as 0,3,5,7,9,... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
> > * It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
> > - * has show entry as below:
> > - * static ssize_t
> > - * example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> > + * has show entry as below::
> > + *
> > + * static ssize_t
> > + * example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> > * struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
> > * loff_t offset, size_t count)
> > - * {
> > + * {
> > * ...
> > - * }
> > + * }
> > + *
> > * With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
> > * to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
> > * >= 4096.
> > @@ -577,6 +583,7 @@ static int bitmap_print_to_buf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > * This function is not a replacement for sprintf() or bitmap_print_to_pagebuf().
> > * It is intended to workaround sysfs limitations discussed above and should be
> > * used carefully in general case for the following reasons:
> > + *
> > * - Time complexity is O(nbits^2/count), comparing to O(nbits) for snprintf().
> > * - Memory complexity is O(nbits), comparing to O(1) for snprintf().
> > * - @off and @count are NOT offset and number of bits to print.
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists