[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkGSzCykWvPXX89O@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:49:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:37:32AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > + mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > > +
> > > + vfree(priv->blob.data);
> >
> > priv->blob.data = NULL;
> > priv->blob.size = 0;
> >
> > > + p = vzalloc(val);
> > > + if (!p) {
> > > + val = 0;
> > > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> >
> > p = vzalloc(val);
> > if (!p)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > > + priv->blob.data = p;
> > > + priv->blob.size = val;
>
> I don't like assigning 'priv' memebers twice, so I'd like to keep it as
> is.
But this will give better understanding of the steps the code performs, no?
(Because this function basically contains two steps at once. I assume it's
done this way due to absence of vrealloc(), right?)
But we have kvrealloc(). Can it be used here?
...
> > Can it be wrapped by DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE()?
>
> I don't see a way. Do you?
Me neither. I mixed this up with (not upstreamed yet) DEFINE_STORE_ATTRIBUTE.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists