linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 43/43] spi: fsi: Implement a timeout for polling status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220328111828.1554086-43-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 07:18:27 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 43/43] spi: fsi: Implement a timeout for polling status

From: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 89b35e3f28514087d3f1e28e8f5634fbfd07c554 ]

The data transfer routines must poll the status register to
determine when more data can be shifted in or out. If the hardware
gets into a bad state, these polling loops may never exit. Prevent
this by returning an error if a timeout is exceeded.

Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220317211426.38940-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c
index b6c7467f0b59..d403a7a3021d 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 
 #define SPI_FSI_BASE			0x70000
 #define SPI_FSI_INIT_TIMEOUT_MS		1000
+#define SPI_FSI_STATUS_TIMEOUT_MS	100
 #define SPI_FSI_MAX_RX_SIZE		8
 #define SPI_FSI_MAX_TX_SIZE		40
 
@@ -299,6 +300,7 @@ static int fsi_spi_transfer_data(struct fsi_spi *ctx,
 				 struct spi_transfer *transfer)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
+	unsigned long end;
 	u64 status = 0ULL;
 
 	if (transfer->tx_buf) {
@@ -315,10 +317,14 @@ static int fsi_spi_transfer_data(struct fsi_spi *ctx,
 			if (rc)
 				return rc;
 
+			end = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_FSI_STATUS_TIMEOUT_MS);
 			do {
 				rc = fsi_spi_status(ctx, &status, "TX");
 				if (rc)
 					return rc;
+
+				if (time_after(jiffies, end))
+					return -ETIMEDOUT;
 			} while (status & SPI_FSI_STATUS_TDR_FULL);
 
 			sent += nb;
@@ -329,10 +335,14 @@ static int fsi_spi_transfer_data(struct fsi_spi *ctx,
 		u8 *rx = transfer->rx_buf;
 
 		while (transfer->len > recv) {
+			end = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_FSI_STATUS_TIMEOUT_MS);
 			do {
 				rc = fsi_spi_status(ctx, &status, "RX");
 				if (rc)
 					return rc;
+
+				if (time_after(jiffies, end))
+					return -ETIMEDOUT;
 			} while (!(status & SPI_FSI_STATUS_RDR_FULL));
 
 			rc = fsi_spi_read_reg(ctx, SPI_FSI_DATA_RX, &in);
-- 
2.34.1