[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd3478ba-ebb9-c1bf-1823-dc03de80b76e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:40:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: wangseok.lee@...sung.com,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jesper.nilsson@...s.com" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"lars.persson@...s.com" <lars.persson@...s.com>
Cc: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...s.com" <linux-arm-kernel@...s.com>,
"kernel@...s.com" <kernel@...s.com>,
전문기 <moonki.jun@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Axis, ARTPEC-8 PCIe driver
On 28/03/2022 13:29, 이왕석 wrote:
>> --------- Original Message ---------
>> Sender : Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> Date : 2022-03-28 18:38 (GMT+9)
>> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Axis, ARTPEC-8 PCIe driver
>>
>> On 28/03/2022 11:02, 이왕석 wrote:
>>>> --------- Original Message ---------
>>>> Sender : Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>>> Date : 2022-03-28 16:12 (GMT+9)
>>>> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Axis, ARTPEC-8 PCIe driver
>>>>
>>>> On 28/03/2022 03:44, 이왕석 wrote:
>>>>> This series patches include newly PCIe support for Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC.
>>>>> ARTPEC-8 is the SoC platform of Axis Communications.
>>>>> PCIe controller driver and phy driver have been newly added.
>>>>> There is also a new MAINTAINER in the addition of phy driver.
>>>>> PCIe controller is designed based on Design-Ware PCIe controller IP
>>>>> and PCIe phy is desinged based on SAMSUNG PHY IP.
>>>>> It also includes modifications to the Design-Ware controller driver to
>>>>> run the 64bit-based ARTPEC-8 PCIe controller driver.
>>>>> It consists of 6 patches in total.
>>>>>
>>>>> This series has been tested on AXIS SW bring-up board
>>>>> with ARTPEC-8 chipset.
>>>>
>>>> You lost mail threading. This makes reading this difficult for us. Plus
>>>> you sent something non-applicable (patch #2), so please resend.
>>>>
>>>> Knowing recent Samsung reluctance to extend existing drivers and always
>>>> duplicate, please provide description/analysis why this driver cannot be
>>>> combined with existing driver. The answer like: we need several syscon
>>>> because we do not implement other frameworks (like interconnect) are not
>>>> valid.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Hello, Krzysztof
>>> Thanks for your review.
>>>
>>> patch#2 was sent to the wrong format so sent again.
>>> Sorry for causing confusion.
>>
>> The first sending was HTML. Second was broken text, so still not working.
>>
>> Please resend everything with proper threading.
>
> Hello, Krzysztof
>
> I sent patch#2 three times.
> due to the influence of the email system,
> there was something wrong with the first and second mails.
> Sorry for causing confusion.
> Did you receive the third patch i sent you?
Maybe, I don't know. It's not threaded so it's difficult to find it
among other 100 emails...
>
>>> This patch is specialized in Artpec-8,
>>> the SoC Platform of Axis Communication, and is newly applied.
>>> Since the target SoC platform is different from the driver previously
>>> used by Samsung, it is difficult to merge with the existing driver.
>>
>> Recently I always saw such answers and sometimes it was true, sometimes
>> not. What is exactly different?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> The main reason this patch should be added is that
> this patch is not the driver applied to exynos platform.
Still this does not explain why you need separate driver.
> Because the SoC platform is different,
> the IP configuration of PCIe is also different.
What is exactly different? Usually drivers can support IP blocks with
some differences...
> We will organize a driver for Artpec-8 platform and
> if there is no special reason, maintain this
> without adding it from the next series.
I don't understand this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists