| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:21:04 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Kalle Valo' <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
CC: Benjamin Stürz <benni@...erz.xyz>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux@...tec.co.uk" <linux@...tec.co.uk>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"robert.moore@...el.com" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"3chas3@...il.com" <3chas3@...il.com>,
"laforge@...monks.org" <laforge@...monks.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"rric@...nel.org" <rric@...nel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com"
<mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
"dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com"
<dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "pali@...nel.org" <pali@...nel.org>,
"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"isdn@...ux-pingi.de" <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com" <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
"ajd@...ux.ibm.com" <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"nico@...xnic.net" <nico@...xnic.net>,
"loic.poulain@...aro.org" <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
"pkshih@...ltek.com" <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org" <wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 21/22] rtw89: Replace comments with C99 initializers
From: Kalle Valo
> Sent: 28 March 2022 10:29
>
> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> writes:
>
> > On 3/26/22 11:59, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
> >> This replaces comments with C99's designated
> >> initializers because the kernel supports them now.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Stürz <benni@...erz.xyz>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 40 +++++++++++------------
> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> >> index 684583955511..3c83a0bfb120 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> >> @@ -97,26 +97,26 @@ static const struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot s_def[] = {
> >> };
> >> static const u32 cxtbl[] = {
> >> - 0xffffffff, /* 0 */
> >> - 0xaaaaaaaa, /* 1 */
> >> - 0x55555555, /* 2 */
> >> - 0x66555555, /* 3 */
> >> - 0x66556655, /* 4 */
> >> - 0x5a5a5a5a, /* 5 */
> >> - 0x5a5a5aaa, /* 6 */
> >> - 0xaa5a5a5a, /* 7 */
> >> - 0x6a5a5a5a, /* 8 */
> >> - 0x6a5a5aaa, /* 9 */
> >> - 0x6a5a6a5a, /* 10 */
> >> - 0x6a5a6aaa, /* 11 */
> >> - 0x6afa5afa, /* 12 */
> >> - 0xaaaa5aaa, /* 13 */
> >> - 0xaaffffaa, /* 14 */
> >> - 0xaa5555aa, /* 15 */
> >> - 0xfafafafa, /* 16 */
> >> - 0xffffddff, /* 17 */
> >> - 0xdaffdaff, /* 18 */
> >> - 0xfafadafa /* 19 */
> >> + [0] = 0xffffffff,
> >> + [1] = 0xaaaaaaaa,
> >> + [2] = 0x55555555,
> >> + [3] = 0x66555555,
> >> + [4] = 0x66556655,
> >> + [5] = 0x5a5a5a5a,
> >> + [6] = 0x5a5a5aaa,
> >> + [7] = 0xaa5a5a5a,
> >> + [8] = 0x6a5a5a5a,
> >> + [9] = 0x6a5a5aaa,
> >> + [10] = 0x6a5a6a5a,
> >> + [11] = 0x6a5a6aaa,
> >> + [12] = 0x6afa5afa,
> >> + [13] = 0xaaaa5aaa,
> >> + [14] = 0xaaffffaa,
> >> + [15] = 0xaa5555aa,
> >> + [16] = 0xfafafafa,
> >> + [17] = 0xffffddff,
> >> + [18] = 0xdaffdaff,
> >> + [19] = 0xfafadafa
> >> };
> >> struct rtw89_btc_btf_tlv {
> >
> >
> > Is this change really necessary? Yes, the entries must be ordered;
> > however, the comment carries that information at very few extra
> > characters. To me, this patch looks like unneeded source churn.
>
> One small benefit I see is to avoid the comment index being wrong and
> there would be no way to catch that. But otherwise I don't have any
> opinion about this.
If the [nn] are wrong the effect is probably worse.
You really don't want a gap!
Doesn't seem worth using C99 initialisers unless they are
#defines or enum values.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists