[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <400edaab-7c6c-f4d1-9a94-e8d0803857fa@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:29:20 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@....edu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Donald Carr <d@...os-reins.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@...dex.ru>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Shuang Zhai <szhai2@...rochester.edu>,
Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@....works>,
Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Kernel Page Reclaim v2 <page-reclaim@...gle.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [page-reclaim] Re: [GIT PULL] Multi-gen LRU for 5.18-rc1
On 26.03.22 21:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to
>>>> you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever
>>>> be.
>>>
>>> So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in
>>> linux-next, has it?
>>
>> No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I
>> was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM
>> developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no
>> strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position.
>
> hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail
> rules :(
>
> Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next. I thought we decided to do
> that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox?
>
I'd appreciate if we could merge most MM-related stuff through the -MM
tree; it exists for a reason IMHO. Andrew, you usually have a very good
feeling when something's ready to be merged upstream (sufficient review
from relevant folks, sufficient exposure via -mm and -next, ...).
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists