[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNP_bWMzSkW=Q8Lc7yRWw8as_FoBpD-zwcweAiSBVn-Fsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:36:22 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Florian Mayer <fmayer@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kasan, arm64, scs, stacktrace: collect stack
traces from Shadow Call Stack
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 16:33, <andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
>
> kasan, arm64, scs, stacktrace: collect stack traces from Shadow Call Stack
>
> Currently, KASAN always uses the normal stack trace collection routines,
> which rely on the unwinder, when saving alloc and free stack traces.
>
> Instead of invoking the unwinder, collect the stack trace by copying
> frames from the Shadow Call Stack whenever it is enabled. This reduces
> boot time by 30% for all KASAN modes when Shadow Call Stack is enabled.
>
> Stack staces are collected from the Shadow Call Stack via a new
> stack_trace_save_shadow() interface.
>
> Note that the frame of the interrupted function is not included into
> the stack trace, as it is not yet saved on the SCS when an interrupt
> happens.
>
> ---
>
> To deal with this last thing, we could save the interrupted frame address
> in another per-CPU variable. I'll look into implementing this for v3.
>
> I decided to postpone the changes to stack depot that avoid copying
> frames twice until a planned upcoming update for stack depot.
That's fair.
> Changes v1->v2:
> - Provide a kernel-wide stack_trace_save_shadow() interface for collecting
> stack traces from shadow stack.
> - Use ptrauth_strip_insn_pac() and READ_ONCE_NOCHECK, see the comments.
> - Get SCS pointer from x18, as per-task value is meant to save the SCS
> value on CPU switches.
> - Collect stack frames from SDEI and IRQ contexts.
Do any of these new changes introduce new (noticeable) overhead (in
particular patch 2)?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists