[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220328131132.GI38351@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:11:32 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: wm8994: Add an off-on delay for WM8994
variant
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 06:01:54PM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
> As per Table 130 of the wm8994 datasheet at [1], there is an off-on
> delay for LDO1 and LDO2. In the wm8958 datasheet [2], I could not
> find any reference to it. I could not find a wm1811 datasheet to
> double-check there, but as no one has complained presumably it works
> without it.
>
> This solves the issue on Samsung Aries boards with a wm8994 where
> register writes fail when the device is powered off and back-on
> quickly.
>
> [1] https://statics.cirrus.com/pubs/proDatasheet/WM8994_Rev4.6.pdf
> [2] https://statics.cirrus.com/pubs/proDatasheet/WM8958_v3.5.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
> ---
I can confirm the 1811 also doesn't mention the cycle time in the
datasheet. So that checks out.
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Part of me wonders if we should just apply it to 1811 and 8958
anyway, I suspect they have the same IP for the LDO and its just
the datasheets never got updated. I had a go chasing the apps guys
here but we are a little short on people who remember details of
these parts. So I guess we trust the datasheets for now, unless
you have any strong feelings, Mark?
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists