[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acc49e6b-acb4-2001-3bdd-241160811020@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 10:41:49 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hwpoison: unmap poisoned page before invalidation
On 2022/3/28 10:24, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 10:14 +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2022/3/27 4:14, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>> /* Retry if a clean page was removed
>>>>> from
>>>>> the cache. */
>>>>> - if (invalidate_inode_page(vmf->page))
>>>>> - poisonret = 0;
>>>>> - unlock_page(vmf->page);
>>>>> + if (invalidate_inode_page(page))
>>>>> + poisonret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
>>>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>>
>>
>> Sure, but when I think more about this, it seems this fix isn't
>> ideal:
>> If VM_FAULT_NOPAGE is returned with page table unset, the process
>> will
>> re-trigger page fault again and again until invalidate_inode_page
>> succeeds
>> to evict the inode page. This might hang the process a really long
>> time.
>> Or am I miss something?
>>
> If invalidate_inode_page fails, we will return
> VM_FAULT_HWPOISON, and kill the task, instead
> of looping indefinitely.
Oh, really sorry! It's a drowsy Monday morning. :)
This patch looks good to me. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists