| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8735j2xigt.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:25:06 -0500
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal/x86: Delay calling signals in atomic
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> writes:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:26:34 +0200
>
> On x86_64 we must disable preemption before we enable interrupts
> for stack faults, int3 and debugging, because the current task is using
> a per CPU debug stack defined by the IST. If we schedule out, another task
> can come in and use the same stack and cause the stack to be corrupted
> and crash the kernel on return.
>
> When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled, spinlock_t locks become sleeping, and
> one of these is the spin lock used in signal handling.
>
> Some of the debug code (int3) causes do_trap() to send a signal.
> This function calls a spinlock_t lock that has been converted to a
> sleeping lock. If this happens, the above issues with the corrupted
> stack is possible.
>
> Instead of calling the signal right away, for PREEMPT_RT and x86,
> the signal information is stored on the stacks task_struct and
> TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set. Then on exit of the trap, the signal resume
> code will send the signal when preemption is enabled.
Folks I really would have appreciated being copied on a signal handling
patch like this.
It is too late to nack, but I think this buggy patch deserved one. Can
we please fix PREEMPT_RT instead?
As far as I can tell this violates all of rules from
implementing/maintaining the RT kernel. Instead of coming up with new
abstractions that makes sense and can use by everyone this introduces
a hack only for PREEMPT_RT and a pretty horrible one at that.
This talks about int3, but the code looks for in_atomic(). Which means
that essentially every call of force_sig will take this path as they
almost all come from exception handlers. It is the nature of signals
that report on faults. An exception is raised and the kernel reports it
to userspace with a fault signal (aka force_sig_xxx).
Further this code is buggy. TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is not the correct
flag to set to enter into exit_to_usermode_loop. TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is
about that happens after signal handling. This very much needs to be
TIF_SIGPENDING with recalc_sigpending and friends updated to know about
"task->force_info".
Does someone own this problem? Can that person please fix this
properly?
I really don't think it is going to be maintainable for PREEMPT_RT to
maintain a separate signal delivery path for faults from the rest of
linux.
Eric
> [ rostedt: Switched from #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT to
> ARCH_RT_DELAYS_SIGNAL_SEND and added comments to the code. ]
> [bigeasy: Add on 32bit as per Yang Shi, minor rewording. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 +++
> kernel/entry/common.c | 9 +++++++++
> kernel/signal.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
> index 2dfb5fea13aff..fc03f4f7ed84c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,19 @@ typedef struct {
> #define SA_IA32_ABI 0x02000000u
> #define SA_X32_ABI 0x01000000u
>
> +/*
> + * Because some traps use the IST stack, we must keep preemption
> + * disabled while calling do_trap(), but do_trap() may call
> + * force_sig_info() which will grab the signal spin_locks for the
> + * task, which in PREEMPT_RT are mutexes. By defining
> + * ARCH_RT_DELAYS_SIGNAL_SEND the force_sig_info() will set
> + * TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and set up the signal to be sent on exit of the
> + * trap.
> + */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
> +#define ARCH_RT_DELAYS_SIGNAL_SEND
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_COMPAT
> #define compat_sigset_t compat_sigset_t
> typedef sigset_t compat_sigset_t;
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 75ba8aa60248b..0514237cee3fc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1087,6 +1087,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> /* Restored if set_restore_sigmask() was used: */
> sigset_t saved_sigmask;
> struct sigpending pending;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + struct kernel_siginfo forced_info;
> +#endif
> unsigned long sas_ss_sp;
> size_t sas_ss_size;
> unsigned int sas_ss_flags;
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index bad713684c2e3..216dbf46e05f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,15 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> schedule();
>
> +#ifdef ARCH_RT_DELAYS_SIGNAL_SEND
> + if (unlikely(current->forced_info.si_signo)) {
> + struct task_struct *t = current;
> +
> + force_sig_info(&t->forced_info);
> + t->forced_info.si_signo = 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (ti_work & _TIF_UPROBE)
> uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 9b04631acde8f..cb2b28c17c0a5 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,34 @@ force_sig_info_to_task(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
> struct k_sigaction *action;
> int sig = info->si_signo;
>
> + /*
> + * On some archs, PREEMPT_RT has to delay sending a signal from a trap
> + * since it can not enable preemption, and the signal code's spin_locks
> + * turn into mutexes. Instead, it must set TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME which will
> + * send the signal on exit of the trap.
> + */
> +#ifdef ARCH_RT_DELAYS_SIGNAL_SEND
> + if (in_atomic()) {
> + struct task_struct *t = current;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(t->forced_info.si_signo))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (is_si_special(info)) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(info != SEND_SIG_PRIV);
> + t->forced_info.si_signo = info->si_signo;
> + t->forced_info.si_errno = 0;
> + t->forced_info.si_code = SI_KERNEL;
> + t->forced_info.si_pid = 0;
> + t->forced_info.si_uid = 0;
> + } else {
> + t->forced_info = *info;
> + }
> +
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> spin_lock_irqsave(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
> action = &t->sighand->action[sig-1];
> ignored = action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists