linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] Intel Sky Lake-E host root ports check.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220328143536.20761-1-shlomop@pliops.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:35:36 +0300
From:   Shlomo Pongratz <shlomopongratz@...il.com>
To:     jgg@...dia.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew.maier@...eticom.com,
        logang@...tatee.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] Intel Sky Lake-E host root ports check.

Hi Jason,

Thank you for your comments I'll fix the spelling mistakes.

You suggested to remove the port field and to ignore the slot number for root ports,
and I understand the reasoning, but, from safety reasons, if we know that device 2030
will always be found on slot 0 and 2032 for example will always be found on slot 2
wouldn't it be prudent to compare the device number vs the port number,
unless you believe that the BIOS/ACPI issue will be fixed.

Shlomo.