linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 12/21] btrfs: don't advance offset for compressed bios in btrfs_csum_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:57:23 -0700
From:   Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, clm@...com, jbacik@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 12/21] btrfs: don't advance offset for
 compressed bios in btrfs_csum_one_bio()

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit e331f6b19f8adde2307588bb325ae5de78617c20 ]
> 
> btrfs_csum_one_bio() loops over each filesystem block in the bio while
> keeping a cursor of its current logical position in the file in order to
> look up the ordered extent to add the checksums to. However, this
> doesn't make much sense for compressed extents, as a sector on disk does
> not correspond to a sector of decompressed file data. It happens to work
> because:
> 
> 1) the compressed bio always covers one ordered extent
> 2) the size of the bio is always less than the size of the ordered
>    extent
> 
> However, the second point will not always be true for encoded writes.
> 
> Let's add a boolean parameter to btrfs_csum_one_bio() to indicate that
> it can assume that the bio only covers one ordered extent. Since we're
> already changing the signature, let's get rid of the contig parameter
> and make it implied by the offset parameter, similar to the change we
> recently made to btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(). Additionally, let's rename
> nr_sectors to blockcount to make it clear that it's the number of
> filesystem blocks, not the number of 512-byte sectors.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/compression.c |  2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |  2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/file-item.c   | 37 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c       |  8 ++++----
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Hi, Sasha,

This patch doesn't fix a real bug, so it should be dropped from both
5.16 and 5.17.

Thanks!