[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRNuoPH6AySUbe6h2D6kghhezyVQtTAvm-t-fTpXH6XwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 23:06:12 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: CGEL <cgel.zte@...il.com>
Cc: rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
eparis@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: do a quick exit when syscall number is invalid
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 9:48 PM CGEL <cgel.zte@...il.com> wrote:
> Sorry could anybody give a hand to solve this? It works well on x86_64 and arm64.
> I have no alpha environment and not familiar to this arch, much thanks!
Regardless of if this is fixed, I'm not convinced this is something we
want to merge. After all, a process executed a syscall and we should
process it like any other; just because it happens to be an
unrecognized syscall on a particular kernel build doesn't mean it
isn't security relevant (probing for specific syscall numbers may be a
useful attack fingerprint).
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists