linux-kernel - Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgqC1OU_a_r80-1EdwSc2SFY0m-V9u6XXr24_C3_XaNcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:10:30 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for v5.18

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 5:26 AM Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
>
> And this is how I came to the conclusion that, despite the weird
> feeling that there are too many conditionals in the i2c-piix4 driver,
> there's nothing smart that can be done to get rid of them, and we just
> have to live with them.

Thanks for the very complete response. Color me convinced.

              Linus