linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cover.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:21:48 -0300
From:   Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
To:     corbet@....net, mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, dlatypov@...gle.com,
        davidgow@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
        cocci@...ia.fr, smatch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, julia.lawall@...ia.fr
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools

Hi,

Thanks to everybody who commented on v1 for your kind and much helpful feedback.

I tried to add suggestions and ideas while keeping the text concise.
Also, I took Dan and Julia's comments and included them into the
documentation (patch 2) because I think they were very helpful in
comparing the tools.
I didn't feel comfortable adding something comparing Sparse and
Coccinelle directly as I'm not an expert with any of these tools either.
Anyhow, that can be something to do in the future.

Thanks,
Marcelo

Marcelo Schmitt (2):
  Documentation: dev-tools: Add a section for static analysis tools
  Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with
    discussion

 Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)

-- 
2.35.1