lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dacf1be8-f20c-de41-5ae5-9dba5e351881@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:51:43 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     vdumpa@...dia.com, Snikam@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 2/4] memory: tegra: Add MC error logging on tegra186
 onward

On 3/22/22 20:23, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/19/2022 9:29 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> 16.03.2022 12:25, Ashish Mhetre пишет:
>>> diff --git a/include/soc/tegra/mc.h b/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>>> index 92f810c55b43..6f115436e344 100644
>>> --- a/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>>> +++ b/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>>> @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ struct tegra_mc_soc {
>>>        const struct tegra_smmu_soc *smmu;
>>>
>>>        u32 intmask;
>>> +     u32 int_channel_mask;
>>
>> ch_intmask
>>
> Okay, I will update,
> 
>>> +     bool has_addr_hi_reg;
>>>
>>>        const struct tegra_mc_reset_ops *reset_ops;
>>>        const struct tegra_mc_reset *resets;
>>> @@ -210,6 +212,8 @@ struct tegra_mc_soc {
>>>
>>>        const struct tegra_mc_icc_ops *icc_ops;
>>>        const struct tegra_mc_ops *ops;
>>> +
>>> +     int (*get_int_channel)(const struct tegra_mc *mc, int
>>> *mc_channel);
>>
>> This should be a part of tegra_mc_ops.
> 
> tegra_mc_ops is common for T186, T194 and T234 i.e. all of them use
> tegra186_mc_ops. get_int_channel function has to be differently
> implemented for all of these SOCs. So I had put it in tegra_mc_soc.

Then tegra_mc_ops shouldn't be common anymore?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ