[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220329083549.2msls7obppsspvgk@basti-XPS-13-9310>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 10:35:49 +0200
From: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/24] media: h264: Avoid wrapping long_term_frame_idx
On 28.03.2022 15:59, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>For long term reference, frame_num is set to long_term_frame_idx which
s/reference/references/
>does not require wrapping. This if fixed by observation, no directly
s/This if/This is/
>related issue have been found yet.
>
>Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
>---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
>index 8d750ee69e74..aebed1cbe05a 100644
>--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
>+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
>@@ -57,8 +57,10 @@ v4l2_h264_init_reflist_builder(struct v4l2_h264_reflist_builder *b,
> * '8.2.4.1 Decoding process for picture numbers' of the spec.
> * TODO: This logic will have to be adjusted when we start
> * supporting interlaced content.
As you change the logic can't you remove the TODO comment now?
>+ * For long term reference, frame_num is set to
s/reference/references/
Greetings,
Sebastian
>+ * long_term_frame_idx which requires no wrapping.
> */
>- if (dpb[i].frame_num > cur_frame_num)
>+ if (!b->refs[i].longterm && dpb[i].frame_num > cur_frame_num)
> b->refs[i].frame_num = (int)dpb[i].frame_num -
> max_frame_num;
> else
>--
>2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists