[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c6e13cc-f768-2cb4-0aa3-cd090b99fc8f@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:32:04 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.or" <benh@...nel.crashing.or>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"songyuanzheng@...wei.com" <songyuanzheng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Set max_mapnr correctly"
On 2022/3/28 22:12, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 26/03/2022 à 08:55, Kefeng Wang a écrit :
>> Hi maintainers,
>>
>> I saw the patches has been reviewed[1], could they be merged?
> Thinking about it once more, I think the patches should go in reverse
> order. Patch 2 should go first and patch 1 should go after.
>
> Otherwise, once patch 1 is applied and patch 2 is not applied yet,
> virt_addr_valid() doesn't work anymore.
Should I resend them or could the maintainer reverse order when merging
them?
>
> Christophe
>
>> Many thanks.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=286464
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists