[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65501e99-0839-5f08-8a69-95e3c77c64ac@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:27:17 +0800
From: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: fix contiguous memmap assumptions about
alloc/free pages
on 2022/3/29 21:08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:09:28PM +0800, Chen Wandun wrote:
>> +#define page_nth(head, tail) (page_to_pfn(tail) - page_to_pfn(head))
> Could we avoid reintroducing page_nth()? It is a terrible name.
how about compound_index ?
>> @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static int free_tail_pages_check(struct page *head_page, struct page *page)
>> ret = 0;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - switch (page - head_page) {
>> + switch (page_nth(head_page, page)) {
>> case 1:
>> /* the first tail page: ->mapping may be compound_mapcount() */
>> if (unlikely(compound_mapcount(page))) {
> This is the only place you use it. I'd suggest free_tail_pages_check()
> should take 'i' as its second parameter instead of 'page + i', then
> there's no need to convert back to i.
OK, I will send v2, but I'm not sure whether similar function like
page_nth is needed elsewhere
>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists