[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkMRFaRwS6dadsQ0@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:00:53 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/vmscan: save a bit of stack space in shrink_lruvec
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:26:15PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account when shrink lruvec. So we can
> save a bit of stack space by shrinking the array size of nr and targets
> to NR_LRU_LISTS - 1. No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index a6e60c78d058..ebd8ffb63673 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2862,8 +2862,9 @@ static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>
> static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> - unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> - unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> + /* LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account. */
> + unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
> + unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
This looks like a problem waiting to happen..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists