[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220329152245.124341-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 17:22:45 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: matthias.bgg@...il.com
Cc: nfraprado@...labora.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Move and check return value of platform_get_irq()
Move the call to platform_get_irq() earlier in the probe function
and check for its return value: if no interrupt is specified, it
wouldn't make sense to try to call devm_request_irq() so, in that
case, we can simply return early.
Moving the platform_get_irq() call also makes it possible to use
one less goto, as clocks aren't required at that stage.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
index 755b8d00faa9..72d82fe2e230 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -2204,6 +2204,10 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!wrp)
return -ENOMEM;
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return irq;
+
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, wrp);
wrp->master = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
@@ -2316,7 +2320,6 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN))
pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->int1_en_all, PWRAP_INT1_EN);
- irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
ret = devm_request_irq(wrp->dev, irq, pwrap_interrupt,
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
"mt-pmic-pwrap", wrp);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists