[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkMtEIu8+g3DgPG5@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:00:16 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: SU Hang <darcy.sh@...group.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: replace 0x180 with EPT_VIOLATION_*
definition
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, SU Hang wrote:
> Using self-expressing macro definition EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_VALIDATION
Nit, this still refers to the name used in v1. With that fixed (Paolo might do
it for you :-) ),
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists