[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkMtsKlCsMOnV1Q0@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:02:56 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] staging: r8188eu: remove HW_VAR_ACM_CTRL from
SetHwReg8188EU()
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 01:39:35PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> SetHwReg8188EU() is called with HW_VAR_ACM_CTRL only in one place.
> Remove the HW_VAR_RESP_SIFS case from SetHwReg8188EU() and replace its
> call with the code from that case. This is part of the ongoing effort
> to get rid of the unwanted hal layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c | 26 -------------------
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
> index eda4e5f9a6af..cde3779ff21d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
> @@ -571,10 +571,31 @@ void WMMOnAssocRsp(struct adapter *padapter)
> }
> }
>
> - if (padapter->registrypriv.acm_method == 1)
> - SetHwReg8188EU(padapter, HW_VAR_ACM_CTRL, (u8 *)(&acm_mask));
> - else
> + if (padapter->registrypriv.acm_method == 1) {
> + u8 acmctrl = rtw_read8(padapter, REG_ACMHWCTRL);
> +
> + if (acm_mask > 1)
> + acmctrl = acmctrl | 0x1;
> +
> + if (acm_mask & BIT(3))
> + acmctrl |= ACMHW_VOQEN;
> + else
> + acmctrl &= (~ACMHW_VOQEN);
> +
> + if (acm_mask & BIT(2))
> + acmctrl |= ACMHW_VIQEN;
> + else
> + acmctrl &= (~ACMHW_VIQEN);
> +
> + if (acm_mask & BIT(1))
> + acmctrl |= ACMHW_BEQEN;
> + else
> + acmctrl &= (~ACMHW_BEQEN);
> +
> + rtw_write8(padapter, REG_ACMHWCTRL, acmctrl);
Shouldn't be a function that explains what you are doing here? Like you
did with previous changes in this patch series?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists