linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] pin control bulk changes for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:15:40 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] pin control bulk changes for v5.18

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:41 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 2:38 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer
> <j.neuschaefer@....net> wrote:
> >
> > It was — but when it was noticed, the fix went through the IRQ tree, on
> > top of a refactoring that happened there (the switch to generic_handle_domain_irq):
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/164751044707.389.16417510835118111853.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
>
> Ok, that ends up at least being identical to what I did, so thats' good.

Ah thanks for hashing this out both of you, I got a bit sweaty there since I
spent the first week in the merge window trying to hash out issues in this
driver.

I suppose there will be a different interesting merge conflict with the IRQ
tree now but the solution should be obvious I hope.

Yours,
Linus Walleij