[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkM6keHS22ajPks5@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 06:57:53 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>,
Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
André Pribil <a.pribil@...k-ipc.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] RT scheduling policies for workqueues
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 29/03/2022 08.30, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2022-03-28 07:39:25 [-1000], Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Hello,
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I wonder whether it'd be useful to provide a set of wrappers which can make
> >> switching between workqueue and kworker easy. Semantics-wise, they're
> >> already mostly aligned and it shouldn't be too difficult to e.g. make an
> >> unbounded workqueue be backed by a dedicated kthread_worker instead of
> >> shared pool depending on a flag, or even allow switching dynamically.
>
> Well, that would certainly not make it any easier for userspace to
> discover the thread it needs to chrt().
Each workqueue have a name and it's not difficult to make dedicated workers
created this way to inherit the name. From user's pov, it's not that
complicated - if kttyd (or whatever) is present, the user can twiddle with
its scheduling class and priority.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists