linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix sorting of retrieved clock rates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220330150551.2573938-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:05:30 +0100
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        etienne.carriere@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com, cristian.marussi@....com
Subject: [PATCH 01/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix sorting of retrieved clock rates

During SCMI Clock protocol initialization, after having retrieved from the
SCMI platform all the available discrete rates for a specific clock, the
clock rates array is sorted, unfortunately using a pointer to its end as
a base instead of its start, so that sorting does not work.

Fix invocation of sort() passing as base a pointer to the start of the
retrieved clock rates array.

Fixes: dccec73de91 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Keep the discrete clock rates sorted")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index cf6fed6dec77..ef6431c6eb1c 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
 
 	if (rate_discrete && rate) {
 		clk->list.num_rates = tot_rate_cnt;
-		sort(rate, tot_rate_cnt, sizeof(*rate), rate_cmp_func, NULL);
+		sort(clk->list.rates, tot_rate_cnt, sizeof(*rate),
+		     rate_cmp_func, NULL);
 	}
 
 	clk->rate_discrete = rate_discrete;
-- 
2.32.0