[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJnmeeBY_2f5NqLhrjymkH6sdmPOBb4i-hDb=qN4-YcCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:16:21 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: use smp_call_function_many() in arch_freq_prepare_all()
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:05 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Can you send an actual patch, with a changelog then ?
>
> I saw kind of a rant about my patch, which was fine IMO.
I forgot to say that avoiding IPI is very nice, of course.
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists