linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/msm/gem: Split out inuse helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGtkpF5MLza0LY_AJsC4vu1nAzXZ5xv4Eusz+Bpp6GFXRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:32:32 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/msm/gem: Split out inuse helper

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:32 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 02:00, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Prep for a following patch.  While we are at it, convert a few remaining
> > WARN_ON()s to GEM_WARN_ON().
>
> Well... GEM_WARN_ON doesn't really look like a 'while we are at it'.
> It might be better to split it into a separate commit.

it was a bit lazy.. I'll split it out

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c     |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h     |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> >  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> > index a4f61972667b..f96d1dc72021 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> > @@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ void msm_gem_describe(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct seq_file *m,
> >                                 name, comm ? ":" : "", comm ? comm : "",
> >                                 vma->aspace, vma->iova,
> >                                 vma->mapped ? "mapped" : "unmapped",
> > -                               vma->inuse);
> > +                               msm_gem_vma_inuse(vma));
> >                         kfree(comm);
> >                 }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > index 947ff7d9b471..1b7f0f0b88bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h
> > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct msm_gem_vma {
> >  int msm_gem_init_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >                 struct msm_gem_vma *vma, int npages,
> >                 u64 range_start, u64 range_end);
> > +bool msm_gem_vma_inuse(struct msm_gem_vma *vma);
> >  void msm_gem_purge_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >                 struct msm_gem_vma *vma);
> >  void msm_gem_unmap_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> > index f914ddbaea89..dc2ae097805e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ msm_gem_address_space_get(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace)
> >         return aspace;
> >  }
> >
> > +bool msm_gem_vma_inuse(struct msm_gem_vma *vma)
> > +{
> > +       return !!vma->inuse;
> > +}
>
> It almost  asks to be a static inline. The patch 04 makes it complex,
> so it's probably not that important.

yeah, that is the reason I didn't make it static inline

BR,
-R

> > +
> >  /* Actually unmap memory for the vma */
> >  void msm_gem_purge_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >                 struct msm_gem_vma *vma)
> > @@ -44,7 +49,7 @@ void msm_gem_purge_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >         unsigned size = vma->node.size << PAGE_SHIFT;
> >
> >         /* Print a message if we try to purge a vma in use */
> > -       if (WARN_ON(vma->inuse > 0))
> > +       if (GEM_WARN_ON(msm_gem_vma_inuse(vma)))
> >                 return;
> >
> >         /* Don't do anything if the memory isn't mapped */
> > @@ -61,7 +66,7 @@ void msm_gem_purge_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >  void msm_gem_unmap_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >                 struct msm_gem_vma *vma)
> >  {
> > -       if (!WARN_ON(!vma->iova))
> > +       if (!GEM_WARN_ON(!vma->iova))
> >                 vma->inuse--;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -73,7 +78,7 @@ msm_gem_map_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >         unsigned size = npages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> >         int ret = 0;
> >
> > -       if (WARN_ON(!vma->iova))
> > +       if (GEM_WARN_ON(!vma->iova))
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> >         /* Increase the usage counter */
> > @@ -100,7 +105,7 @@ msm_gem_map_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >  void msm_gem_close_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >                 struct msm_gem_vma *vma)
> >  {
> > -       if (WARN_ON(vma->inuse > 0 || vma->mapped))
> > +       if (GEM_WARN_ON(msm_gem_vma_inuse(vma) || vma->mapped))
> >                 return;
> >
> >         spin_lock(&aspace->lock);
> > @@ -120,7 +125,7 @@ int msm_gem_init_vma(struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace,
> >  {
> >         int ret;
> >
> > -       if (WARN_ON(vma->iova))
> > +       if (GEM_WARN_ON(vma->iova))
> >                 return -EBUSY;
> >
> >         spin_lock(&aspace->lock);
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry