[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1648665137.s2tuu8nsoa.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:10:20 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: "aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] objtool/mcount: Add powerpc specific functions
Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/03/2022 à 14:01, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> writes:
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:09:20AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> What are current works in progress on objtool ? Should I wait Josh's
>>>> changes before starting looking at all this ? Should I wait for anything
>>>> else ?
>>>
>>> I'm not making any major changes to the code, just shuffling things
>>> around to make the interface more modular. I hope to have something
>>> soon (this week). Peter recently added a big feature (Intel IBT) which
>>> is already in -next.
>>>
>>> Contributions are welcome, with the understanding that you'll help
>>> maintain it ;-)
>>>
>>> Some years ago Kamalesh Babulal had a prototype of objtool for ppc64le
>>> which did the full stack validation. I'm not sure what ever became of
>>> that.
>>
>> From memory he was starting to clean the patches up in late 2019, but I
>> guess that probably got derailed by COVID. AFAIK he never posted
>> anything. Maybe someone at IBM has a copy internally (Naveen?).
Kamalesh had a WIP series to enable stack validation on powerpc. From
what I recall, he was waiting on and/or working with the arm64 folks
around some of the common changes needed in objtool.
>>
>>> FWIW, there have been some objtool patches for arm64 stack validation,
>>> but the arm64 maintainers have been hesitant to get on board with
>>> objtool, as it brings a certain maintenance burden. Especially for the
>>> full stack validation and ORC unwinder. But if you only want inline
>>> static calls and/or mcount then it'd probably be much easier to
>>> maintain.
>>
>> I would like to have the stack validation, but I am also worried about
>> the maintenance burden.
>>
>> I guess we start with mcount, which looks pretty minimal judging by this
>> series, and see how we go from there.
>>
>
> I'm not sure mcount is really needed as we have recordmcount, but at
> least it is an easy one to start with and as we have recordmount we can
> easily compare the results and check it works as expected.
On the contrary, I think support for mcount in objtool is something we
want to get going soon (hopefully, in time for v5.19) given the issues
we are seeing with recordmcount:
- https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/388
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220211014313.1790140-1-aik@ozlabs.ru/
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists