linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add a third Alderlake CPU model number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29d602962d6542bd90e877c104afcc7f@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 19:57:09 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add a third Alderlake CPU model number

>> +#define INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE_N		0xBE
>
> This is missing the /* Gracemont */ comment. That is, according to
> Google, Alder Lake N is an E core only SKU.

I can neither confirm nor deny that information.

> So alternatively, we can
> call it: INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GRACEMONT ....
>
> /me runs like heck :-)

And so you should :-) I think that will just cause a different level
of confusion.

-Tony