[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkTP/+jhhAX6xlAQ@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:47:43 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re:
[ammarfaizi2-block:google/android/kernel/common/android12-trusty-5.10
4036/5872] WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4111c4): Section mismatch in
reference from the function memblock_bottom_up() to the variable
.meminit.data:memblock
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 02:53:14PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree: https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block google/android/kernel/common/android12-trusty-5.10
> head: 07055bfd3d810d41a38354693dfaa55a6f8c0025
> commit: 0e0bfc41fdf4d79d39ebe929844cdee44f97366d [4036/5872] UPSTREAM: mm: cma: allocate cma areas bottom-up
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a005 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220330/202203301412.MZ7wQvQz-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 0f6d9501cf49ce02937099350d08f20c4af86f3d)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/0e0bfc41fdf4d79d39ebe929844cdee44f97366d
> git remote add ammarfaizi2-block https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block
> git fetch --no-tags ammarfaizi2-block google/android/kernel/common/android12-trusty-5.10
> git checkout 0e0bfc41fdf4d79d39ebe929844cdee44f97366d
> # save the config file to linux build tree
> mkdir build_dir
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>
> >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4111c4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_bottom_up() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock
> The function memblock_bottom_up() references
> the variable __meminitdata memblock.
> This is often because memblock_bottom_up lacks a __meminitdata
> annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong.
I guess this patch should fix it, however I fail to reproduce the original issue.
Maybe it's up to the specific compiler version.
--
>From b55a8dd19f4156d7e24ec39b18ede06965ce1c4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:42:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] memblock: fix memblock_bottom_up() and
memblock_set_bottom_up() annotations
memblock_bottom_up() and memblock_set_bottom_up() lack __meminitdata
annotations causing compiler warnings like:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4111c4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_bottom_up() to the
variable .meminit.data:memblock
Fix it by adding the missing annotation and removing the wrong
__meminit annotation.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 50ad19662a32..536bc2fc31e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static inline void *memblock_alloc_node(phys_addr_t size,
/*
* Set the allocation direction to bottom-up or top-down.
*/
-static inline __init_memblock void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
+static inline __initdata_memblock void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
{
memblock.bottom_up = enable;
}
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static inline __init_memblock void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
* if this is true, that said, memblock will allocate memory
* in bottom-up direction.
*/
-static inline __init_memblock bool memblock_bottom_up(void)
+static inline __initdata_memblock bool memblock_bottom_up(void)
{
return memblock.bottom_up;
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists