[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb7c0403-1d1f-5de4-8cdd-52a8de148fbe@fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:49:31 +0800
From: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <djwong@...nel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <david@...morbit.com>,
<jane.chu@...cle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/8] mm: move pgoff_address() to vma_pgoff_address()
在 2022/3/30 13:46, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 08:07:44PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>> Since it is not a DAX-specific function, move it into mm and rename it
>> to be a generic helper.
>
> FYI, there is a patch in -mm and linux-next:
>
> "mm: rmap: introduce pfn_mkclean_range() to cleans PTEs"
>
> that adds a vma_pgoff_address which seems like a bit of a superset of
> the one added in this patch, but only is in mm/internal.h.
Yes. The function in this patch handles more cases.
So, let me rebase onto this patch and move the function into
/include/linux/mm.h, so that fs/dax.c can also use it. Is this ok?
--
Thanks,
Ruan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists