linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] dax: Introduce holder for dax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:58:21 +0800
From:   Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, david <david@...morbit.com>,
        Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] dax: Introduce holder for dax_device



在 2022/3/30 18:13, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 06:03:01PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>>
>> Because I am not sure if the offset between each layer is page aligned.  For
>> example, when pmem dirver handles ->memory_failure(), it should subtract its
>> ->data_offset when it calls dax_holder_notify_failure().
> 
> If they aren't, none of the DAX machinery would work.

OK. Got it.

So, use page-based function signature for ->memory_failure():

int (*memory_failure)(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, unsigned long pfn,
		      unsigned long nr_pfns, int flags);


As the code I pasted before, pmem driver will subtract its 
->data_offset, which is byte-based. And the filesystem who implements 
->notify_failure() will calculate the offset in unit of byte again.

So, leave its function signature byte-based, to avoid repeated conversions.

int (*notify_failure)(struct dax_device *dax_dev, u64 offset,
		      u64 len, int mf_flags);

What do you think?


--
Thanks,
Ruan.