[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkOfJeXm8MiMOEyh@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:07:01 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/5] KVM: X86: Boost vCPU which is in critical
section
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 425fd7f38fa9..6b300496bbd0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10375,6 +10375,28 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return r;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_vcpu_non_preemptable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
s/preemtable/preemptible
And I'd recommend inverting the return, and also return a bool, i.e.
static bool kvm_vcpu_is_preemptible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int count;
> +
> + if (!vcpu->arch.pv_pc.preempt_count_enabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.pv_pc.preempt_count_cache,
> + &count, sizeof(int)))
> + return (count & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
This cements PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED into KVM's guest/host ABI. I doubt the sched
folks will be happy with that.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists