[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220330133131.GU3457@minyard.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:31:31 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: use simple i2c probe function
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> > their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> > ("probe_new") can be used instead.
> >
> > This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
>
> Looks good and builds fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>
Thanks, I have this queued and I've added the review.
I'm just waiting for the merge window to close before I put it into the
next tree.
-corey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists