[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOS=r1HhBRjKmb6RE9MLbxD3TLfOxvATXH-qLHnr9yjO35g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:17:12 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: print clearer error message when there's no
TAP output
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 5:43 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Before:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null
> ...
> [ERROR] Test : invalid KTAP input!
>
> After:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null
> ...
> [ERROR] Test <missing>: could not find any KTAP output!
>
> This error message gets printed out when extract_tap_output() yielded no
> lines. So while it could be because of malformed KTAP output from KUnit,
> it could also be due to to not having any KTAP output at all.
>
> Try and make the error message here more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> ---
At first I thought that this was "working as intended", but I agree
that it's a bit confusing, so changing it is for the best.
(And there's no sense getting too bogged down in the philosophical
difference between "invalid TAP" and "not valid TAP" :-))
This works fine here, and the code looks sensible. I tested it with
the --json option as well, and the result ("test_cases" being empty)
makes sense to me:
---
{
"name": "KUnit Test Group",
"arch": "UM",
"defconfig": "kunit_defconfig",
"build_environment": "",
"sub_groups": [],
"test_cases": [],
"lab_name": null,
"kernel": null,
"job": null,
"git_branch": "kselftest"
}
---
So, this is:
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cheers,
-- David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists