[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220331230632.957634-2-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 01:06:31 +0200
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] iio: ssp_sensors: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
---
drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
index 769bd9280524..f32b04b63ea1 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
@@ -331,12 +331,11 @@ static int ssp_parse_dataframe(struct ssp_data *data, char *dataframe, int len)
/* threaded irq */
int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
{
- bool found = false;
char *buffer;
u8 msg_type;
int ret;
u16 length, msg_options;
- struct ssp_msg *msg, *n;
+ struct ssp_msg *msg = NULL, *iter, *n;
ret = spi_read(data->spi, data->header_buffer, SSP_HEADER_BUFFER_SIZE);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -362,15 +361,15 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
* received with no order
*/
mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, n, &data->pending_list, list) {
- if (msg->options == msg_options) {
- list_del(&msg->list);
- found = true;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, n, &data->pending_list, list) {
+ if (iter->options == msg_options) {
+ list_del(&iter->list);
+ msg = iter;
break;
}
}
- if (!found) {
+ if (!msg) {
/*
* here can be implemented dead messages handling
* but the slave should not send such ones - it is to
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists