| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <509fb6fb5c581e6bf14149dff17d7426a6b061f2.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:55:01 +1300
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...il.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 027/104] KVM: TDX: initialize VM with TDX
specific parameters
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 11:48 -0800, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>
> TDX requires additional parameters for TDX VM for confidential execution to
> protect its confidentiality of its memory contents and its CPU state from
> any other software, including VMM. When creating guest TD VM before
> creating vcpu, the number of vcpu, TSC frequency (that is same among
> vcpus. and it can't be changed.) CPUIDs which is emulated by the TDX
> module. It means guest can trust those CPUIDs. and sha384 values for
> measurement.
>
> Add new subcommand, KVM_TDX_INIT_VM, to pass parameters for TDX guest. It
> assigns encryption key to the TDX guest for memory encryption. TDX
> encrypts memory per-guest bases. It assigns Device model passes per-VM
> parameters for the TDX guest. The maximum number of vcpus, tsc frequency
> (TDX guest has fised VM-wide TSC frequency. not per-vcpu. The TDX guest
> can not change it.), attributes (production or debug), available extended
> features (which is reflected into guest XCR0, IA32_XSS MSR), cpuids, sha384
> measurements, and etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 12 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h | 26 ++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 +
> tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 12 ++
> 7 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5ff7a0fba311..290e200f012c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1234,6 +1234,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> hpa_t hv_root_tdp;
> spinlock_t hv_root_tdp_lock;
> #endif
> +
> + gfn_t gfn_shared_mask;
> };
>
> struct kvm_vm_stat {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 70f9be4ea575..6e26dde0dce6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter {
> /* Trust Domain eXtension sub-ioctl() commands. */
> enum kvm_tdx_cmd_id {
> KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES = 0,
> + KVM_TDX_INIT_VM,
>
> KVM_TDX_CMD_NR_MAX,
> };
> @@ -561,4 +562,15 @@ struct kvm_tdx_capabilities {
> struct kvm_tdx_cpuid_config cpuid_configs[0];
> };
>
> +struct kvm_tdx_init_vm {
> + __u32 max_vcpus;
> + __u32 tsc_khz;
> + __u64 attributes;
> + __u64 cpuid;
Is it better to append all CPUIDs directly into this structure, perhaps at end
of this structure, to make it more consistent with TD_PARAMS?
Also, I think somewhere in commit message or comments we should explain why
CPUIDs are passed here (why existing KVM_SET_CUPID2 is not sufficient).
> + __u64 mrconfigid[6]; /* sha384 digest */
> + __u64 mrowner[6]; /* sha384 digest */
> + __u64 mrownerconfig[6]; /* sha348 digest */
> + __u64 reserved[43]; /* must be zero for future extensibility */
> +};
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_KVM_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index 20b45bb0b032..236faaca68a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,203 @@ static int tdx_capabilities(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *cmd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *tdx_find_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx,
> + u32 function, u32 index)
> +{
> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < kvm_tdx->cpuid_nent; i++) {
> + e = &kvm_tdx->cpuid_entries[i];
> +
> + if (e->function == function && (e->index == index ||
> + !(e->flags & KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX)))
> + return e;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int setup_tdparams(struct kvm *kvm, struct td_params *td_params,
> + struct kvm_tdx_init_vm *init_vm)
> +{
> + struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm);
> + struct tdx_cpuid_config *config;
> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
> + struct tdx_cpuid_value *value;
> + u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
> + u64 guest_supported_xss;
> + u32 guest_tsc_khz;
> + int max_pa;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* init_vm->reserved must be zero */
> + if (find_first_bit((unsigned long *)init_vm->reserved,
> + sizeof(init_vm->reserved) * 8) !=
> + sizeof(init_vm->reserved) * 8)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + td_params->max_vcpus = init_vm->max_vcpus;
> +
> + td_params->attributes = init_vm->attributes;
> + if (td_params->attributes & TDX_TD_ATTRIBUTE_PERFMON) {
> + pr_warn("TD doesn't support perfmon. KVM needs to save/restore "
> + "host perf registers properly.\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
PERFMON can be supported but it's not support in this series, so perhaps add a
comment to explain it's a TODO?
> +
> + /* TODO: Enforce consistent CPUID features for all vCPUs. */
I guess you have to enforce when you do KVM_SET_CPUID2 after vcpu is created?
Then I guess this comment shouldn't be here, because the enforcement isn't
something you can do here in setup_tdparams().
> + for (i = 0; i < tdx_caps.nr_cpuid_configs; i++) {
> + config = &tdx_caps.cpuid_configs[i];
> +
> + entry = tdx_find_cpuid_entry(kvm_tdx, config->leaf,
> + config->sub_leaf);
> + if (!entry)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Non-configurable bits must be '0', even if they are fixed to
> + * '1' by the TDX module, i.e. mask off non-configurable bits.
> + */
> + value = &td_params->cpuid_values[i];
> + value->eax = entry->eax & config->eax;
> + value->ebx = entry->ebx & config->ebx;
> + value->ecx = entry->ecx & config->ecx;
> + value->edx = entry->edx & config->edx;
> + }
> +
> + max_pa = 36;
> + entry = tdx_find_cpuid_entry(kvm_tdx, 0x80000008, 0);
> + if (entry)
> + max_pa = entry->eax & 0xff;
> +
> + td_params->eptp_controls = VMX_EPTP_MT_WB;
> + if (cpu_has_vmx_ept_5levels() && max_pa > 48) {
> + td_params->eptp_controls |= VMX_EPTP_PWL_5;
> + td_params->exec_controls |= TDX_EXEC_CONTROL_MAX_GPAW;
> + } else {
> + td_params->eptp_controls |= VMX_EPTP_PWL_4;
> + }
Not quite sure, but could we support >48 GPA with 4-level EPT?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists