[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkU49BQ4rPheOG0f@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:15:32 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, CGEL <cgel.zte@...il.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/psi: make PSI annotations of submit_bio only work
for file pages
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:17:09PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> It's add_to_page_cache_lru() that sets the flag.
>
> Basically, when a PageWorkingset (hot) page gets reclaimed, the bit is
> stored in the vacated tree slot. When the entry is brought back in,
> add_to_page_cache_lru() transfers it to the newly allocated page.
Ok. In this case my patch didn't quite do the right thing for readahead
either. But that does leave a question for the btrfs compressed
case, which only adds extra pages to a read to readahad a bigger
cluster size - that is these pages are not read at the request of the
VM. Does it really make sense to do PSI accounting for them in that
case?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists