linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/vmscan: remove redundant folio_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:44:03 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/vmscan: remove redundant folio_test_swapbacked
 check when folio is file lru

On 2022/3/31 14:37, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 9:26 PM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> When folio is file lru, folio_test_swapbacked is guaranteed to be true. So
>>> it's unnecessary to check it here again. No functional change intended.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/vmscan.c | 3 +--
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index 1678802e03e7..7c1a9713bfc9 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -1434,8 +1434,7 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio,
>>>          * Anonymous pages are not handled by flushers and must be written
>>>          * from reclaim context. Do not stall reclaim based on them
>>>          */
>>> -       if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) ||
>>> -           (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))) {
>>> +       if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) || folio_test_anon(folio)) {
>>
>> At least your login is no problem since folio_is_file_lru() is equal to
>> !folio_test_swapbacked().  But the new code is not clear to me.
>> The old code is easy to understand, e.g. folio_test_anon(folio) &&
>> !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) tells us that the anon pages which
>> do not need to be swapped should be skipped.
> 
> That is for MADV_FREE pages.  The code is introduced in commit
> 802a3a92ad7a ("mm: reclaim MADV_FREE pages").
> 
> So I think the original code is better.  It's an implementation detail
> that folio_is_file_lru() equals !folio_test_swapbacked().  It may be
> better to add some comments here for MADV_FREE pages.
> 

Do you tend to drop this patch or adding a comment with the change in this patch or something else?

Thanks.

>> So I'm neutral on the patch.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
> .
>