[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f93ebeaa9c2ad74b0f5dbb2703afa4c8e0bac.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:44:30 +0800
From: Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
To: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<hsinyi@...omium.org>, <fshao@...omium.org>,
<moudy.ho@...iatek.com>, <roy-cw.yeh@...iatek.com>,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>, <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
<singo.chang@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 5/8] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mutex support for mt8195
vdosys0
Hi CK,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 15:21 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Jason:
>
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 11:28 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
> > Add mtk-mutex support for mt8195 vdosys0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 103
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index aaf8fc1abb43..1c7ffcdadcea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> > #define MT8183_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
> > #define MT8183_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x2c
> >
> > +#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
> > +#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF 0x2c
> > +
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(n) (0x20 + 0x20 *
> > (n))
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX(n) (0x24 + 0x20 * (n))
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_RST(n) (0x28 + 0x20 *
> > (n))
> > @@ -96,6 +99,36 @@
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM1 24
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OD 25
> >
[snip]
> > > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_VPP_MERGE 20
> > > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DP_INTF0 21
> > > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_VPP1_DL_RELAY0 22
> > >
> > > Useless, remove.
> > >
> > > > +#define MT8195_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_VPP1_DL_RELAY1 23
> > >
> > > Ditto.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > CK
> >
> > Although these definitions are not used, they represent the
> > functionality provided by this register.
> >
> > I think we can show that we have these capabilities by defining
> them.
> >
> > Can we keep these definitions?
>
> OK, but add some information that we could know how to use it. What's
> these DL_RELAY and when should we add these to mutex?
>
> Regards,
> CK
DL_RELAY is used for the cross mmsys mux settings.
We won't use these setting currently, so I think
I just remove these useless define.
Thanks.
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
[snip]
--
Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists