[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220331103237.340796-1-daniel.baluta@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:32:37 +0300
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....nxp.com>
To: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Cc: s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shengjiu.wang@....com, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Make rsc_table optional
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
app on the DSP and we do not need a resource table.
remoteproc core allows us having an optional rsc_table.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 2abee78df96e..987ab1add761 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -802,6 +802,14 @@ static void imx_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
dev_err(dev, "%s: failed (%d, err:%d)\n", __func__, vqid, err);
}
+static int imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+ if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
+ dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
.prepare = imx_dsp_rproc_prepare,
.unprepare = imx_dsp_rproc_unprepare,
@@ -809,7 +817,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
.stop = imx_dsp_rproc_stop,
.kick = imx_dsp_rproc_kick,
.load = imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments,
- .parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table,
+ .parse_fw = imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw,
.sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
.get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
};
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists